McKenzie Property Rezoning (Z26-23)

Adjacent cattle farmer showed flooding photos, questioned the low smart growth score, and warned the rezoning would set a precedent for surrounding properties.

Engineer for the applicant argued RSF-1 is low density, drainage could be improved, and no wetlands exist on the property.

Property owner bounded on two sides said the rezoning would radically change the area's character and conflict with the county's plan.

Lives across from the proposed entrance; cited the 4-of-40 scorecard and said he'd accept a large-lot subdivision without rezoning.

Charlotte Lane resident at the property's edge went on record opposing, citing the low scorecard score and well-water contamination fears.

A teacher and concerned mother who was unprepared to speak but registered opposition, mentioning her environmental science background.